PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBELX vs. SEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
-2.91%20.86%-4.37%12.50%-6.99%-9.37%2.61%0.89%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
-1.41%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%4.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBELX achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than SEDAX's -1.41% return.


DBELX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
0.26%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*

SEDAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
2.79%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBELX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBELX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBELX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBELX
DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBELXSEDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

2.66

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

3.72

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.66

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.57

12.37

-3.80

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBELX and SEDAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBELXSEDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.66

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.39

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between DBELX and SEDAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

DBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than SEDAX's 7.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
4.02%4.41%3.80%2.03%2.01%1.98%1.17%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
7.41%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Drawdowns

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBELX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum SEDAX drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBELX and SEDAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBELXSEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-37.03%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-5.49%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-27.01%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.89%

-5.49%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-6.83%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.18%

+0.29%

Volatility

DBELX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) at 2.94%. This indicates that DBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBELXSEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

2.94%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

3.96%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65%

5.59%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

6.90%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.39%

8.41%

-1.02%