DBELX vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
DBELX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jun 27, 2019. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
DBELX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBELX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund | -3.02% | 20.86% | -4.37% | 12.50% | -6.99% | -9.37% | 2.61% | 0.89% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.00% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 3.90% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBELX having a -3.02% return and PYELX slightly higher at -3.00%.
DBELX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- —
PYELX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBELX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBELX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBELX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
DBELX
PYELX
DBELX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBELX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.11 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 1.22 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.77 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.24 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 3.45 | +4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBELX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.11 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.04 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.03 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBELX and PYELX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBELX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
DBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than PYELX's 7.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund | 4.02% | 4.41% | 3.80% | 2.03% | 2.01% | 1.98% | 1.17% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.49% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
DBELX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBELX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBELX and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBELX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -56.98% | +35.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -50.21% | +43.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -51.98% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -6.64% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -16.96% | +9.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 3.54% | -2.01% |
Volatility
DBELX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) at 3.36%. This indicates that DBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBELX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.36% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 4.66% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 111.80% | -105.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.98% | 50.59% | -43.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 36.37% | -28.98% |