PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBCMX vs. SRUUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's -4.05% return.


DBCMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
21.33%
6M
23.44%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
6.24%

SRUUF

1D
-1.22%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
-4.05%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
21.33%6.10%0.45%-3.96%13.40%7.22%
SRUUF
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-4.05%12.66%-18.89%82.09%7.65%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DBCMX and SRUUF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021

0.15

The correlation between DBCMX and SRUUF shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBCMX vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBCMX
DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SRUUF
SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBCMXSRUUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.05

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

0.17

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

0.33

+11.55

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SRUUF Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBCMX and SRUUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum SRUUF drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and SRUUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-48.68%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-23.40%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-48.68%

+33.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.50%

-25.46%

+15.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-21.80%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

12.23%

-10.12%

Volatility

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) is 4.08%, while Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that DBCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

8.19%

-4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

24.77%

-12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

34.11%

-20.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

41.69%

-25.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

41.69%

-27.05%

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison

DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
2.50%3.04%2.89%3.30%46.88%13.53%0.00%1.04%1.21%5.23%0.51%
SRUUF
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBCMX and SRUUF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRUUF has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to DBCMX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBCMX dropped -37.62% vs SRUUF's -48.68%.

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBCMX and SRUUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer