PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBCMX vs. SRUUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
23.68%6.10%0.45%-3.96%13.40%6.42%
SRUUF
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
3.76%12.66%-18.89%82.09%7.65%17.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's 3.76% return.


DBCMX

1D
0.45%
1M
13.32%
YTD
23.68%
6M
26.71%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
7.37%

SRUUF

1D
5.15%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
3.76%
6M
0.85%
1Y
41.75%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBCMX vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBCMX
DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SRUUF
SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

1.11

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

1.66

+1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.92

+1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.71

4.77

+8.94

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the SRUUF Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBCMX and SRUUF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.11

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.43

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between DBCMX and SRUUF is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison

DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
2.45%3.04%2.89%3.30%46.88%13.53%0.00%1.04%1.21%5.23%0.51%
SRUUF
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum SRUUF drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and SRUUF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-48.68%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-22.98%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.39%

+19.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.47%

-21.88%

+8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

9.25%

-7.15%

Volatility

DBCMX vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) is 6.16%, while Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that DBCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBCMXSRUUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

11.92%

-5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

27.44%

-17.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

37.98%

-25.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

42.29%

-26.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

42.29%

-27.79%