DBCMX vs. DBSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX).
DBCMX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on May 17, 2015. DBSCX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Aug 3, 2014.
Performance
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 22.02% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 0.30% | 8.46% | 7.78% | 8.55% | -8.10% | 4.13% | 1.83% | 5.68% | 3.03% | 8.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 22.02% return, which is significantly higher than DBSCX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX has outperformed DBSCX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while DBSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.
DBCMX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 10.54%
- YTD
- 22.02%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 26.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
DBSCX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than DBSCX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBCMX vs. DBSCX — Risk / Return Rank
DBCMX
DBSCX
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBCMX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.65 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 3.83 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.78 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 14.70 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBCMX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.65 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.39 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 1.59 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.57 | -1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBCMX and DBSCX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Dividend Comparison
DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than DBSCX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.49% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 5.92% | 6.50% | 7.09% | 6.77% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 4.64% | 6.04% | 7.43% | 9.01% | 9.73% | 9.53% |
Drawdowns
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than DBSCX's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and DBSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBCMX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -14.12% | -23.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | -1.60% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.60% | -9.52% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.62% | -14.12% | -23.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.45% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -1.25% | -12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 0.41% | +1.70% |
Volatility
DBCMX vs. DBSCX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) at 1.00%. This indicates that DBCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBCMX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 1.00% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 1.53% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 2.29% | +10.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 2.70% | +13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 2.90% | +11.61% |