DBC vs. QQQ
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBC returned 7.62%/yr vs 22.01%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
DBC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 7.62%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.01% annualized return.
DBC
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
DBC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 18.29% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.95% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and QQQ is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.24 |
The correlation between DBC and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
QQQ
DBC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.71 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 10.01 | -2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -82.97% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -11.96% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -22.77% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -35.12% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -35.12% | -6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.57% | -4.66% | -26.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -32.72% | -13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.23% | +0.24% |
Volatility
DBC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) is 5.01%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that DBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 9.17% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 14.54% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 17.95% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 22.69% | -3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 22.41% | -4.60% |
DBC vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.81% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and QQQ have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to DBC (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.01% vs 7.62% for DBC. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer