DBC vs. DBMF
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. DBC is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBC returned 11.29%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
DBC vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 27.68% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.27% return.
DBC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 27.68%
- 6M
- 28.76%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.68% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 3.09% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.27% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and DBMF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.23 |
The correlation between DBC and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
DBMF
DBC vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 4.50 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 16.30 | -6.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -20.39% | -55.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -6.10% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -15.60% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -20.39% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.14% | -1.91% | -24.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.19% | -6.56% | -39.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 1.68% | +1.89% |
Volatility
DBC vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.71%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 2.71% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 10.00% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 12.35% | +6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 12.55% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 12.41% | +5.41% |
DBC vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DBC and DBMF have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
DBC vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than DBMF's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and DBMF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to DBMF (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, DBC leads with 11.29% vs 8.01% for DBMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBC has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBC and DBMF have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 2.61% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iM Global Partners.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer