PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBC vs. CF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBC vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.71% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 63.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed CF with an annualized return of 9.54%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 20.99% annualized return.


DBC

1D
0.44%
1M
11.34%
6M
20.55%
YTD
31.71%
1Y
35.60%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
2.04%

CF

1D
-0.46%
1M
15.75%
6M
35.55%
YTD
63.40%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
20.99%
ALL TIME*
21.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$259.19M$278.77M$321.72M
$27.92M$29.19M$34.33M

DBC vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
31.71%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.86%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
63.40%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and CF is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006

0.38

The correlation between DBC and CF shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBC vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBC vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBCCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.49

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

3.31

+3.89

DBC vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and CF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBC vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and CF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.36%

-76.73%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-25.45%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-29.16%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-48.36%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-60.74%

+19.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.81%

-8.65%

-15.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.07%

-24.87%

-21.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

11.44%

-6.44%

Volatility

DBC vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) is 7.01%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that DBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

10.07%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

35.61%

-18.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

42.03%

-22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

38.14%

-18.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

40.08%

-22.21%

Dividends

DBC vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than CF's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.60%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.53%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBC and CF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CF has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to DBC (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs CF's -76.73%.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBC and CF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer