PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBALX vs. GRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBALX achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DBALX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of 5.86%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


DBALX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.16%
1Y
8.69%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
5.86%

GRSPX

1D
1.02%
1M
2.26%
YTD
21.91%
6M
20.47%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
3.18%9.88%7.98%7.81%-11.01%14.19%3.54%18.55%-8.16%11.11%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
21.91%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DBALX and GRSPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between DBALX and GRSPX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBALX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBALX
DBALX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBALXGRSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.00

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

9.46

-3.32

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBALX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBALX drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, smaller than the maximum GRSPX drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBALX and GRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBALXGRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-35.67%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-30.41%

+25.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-30.41%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-30.41%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.89%

-35.07%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-0.23%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-4.81%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

3.09%

-1.59%

Volatility

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) is 2.21%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 50.71%. This indicates that DBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBALXGRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

50.71%

-48.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.98%

50.93%

-45.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.56%

56.53%

-49.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.57%

28.14%

-19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

22.52%

-12.56%

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBALX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBALX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

DBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than GRSPX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
5.39%5.28%3.73%2.19%4.24%1.59%2.00%2.73%2.03%2.37%1.04%0.00%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.71%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBALX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (50.71%) compared to DBALX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBALX dropped -27.89% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

DBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBALX and GRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer