PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBALX vs. DAVPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBALX achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than DAVPX's 6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, DBALX has underperformed DAVPX with an annualized return of 5.72%, while DAVPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


DBALX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.04%
6M
4.34%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.72%

DAVPX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.84%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.39%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
3.04%9.88%7.98%7.81%-11.01%14.19%3.54%18.55%-8.16%11.11%
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
6.80%10.73%17.50%28.98%-20.01%22.90%13.78%32.89%-9.23%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DBALX and DAVPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between DBALX and DAVPX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBALX vs. DAVPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBALX
DBALX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DAVPX
DAVPX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DAVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBALXDAVPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

1.84

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.46

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

5.59

+1.13

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DAVPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBALX and DAVPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBALXDAVPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.44

+0.18

Drawdowns

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBALX drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, smaller than the maximum DAVPX drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBALX and DAVPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBALXDAVPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-51.80%

+23.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-10.47%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-17.25%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-26.40%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.89%

-34.99%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

0.00%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-8.34%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.74%

-1.27%

Volatility

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) is 1.59%, while Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) has a volatility of 2.41%. This indicates that DBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAVPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBALXDAVPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.41%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

8.49%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.30%

11.55%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

16.73%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.95%

17.82%

-7.87%

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBALX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than DAVPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBALX vs. DAVPX - Dividend Comparison

DBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than DAVPX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
4.13%4.43%2.94%6.31%4.71%8.10%1.16%2.24%1.30%2.48%3.37%3.97%
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
5.12%5.28%3.73%2.19%4.24%1.59%2.00%2.73%2.03%2.37%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBALX and DAVPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAVPX has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to DBALX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBALX dropped -27.89% vs DAVPX's -51.80%.

DBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBALX and DAVPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer