PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBALX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBALX achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.57% return.


DBALX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.04%
6M
4.34%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.72%

FSRKX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.57%
6M
9.33%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
3.04%9.88%7.98%7.81%-11.01%14.19%3.54%4.92%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.57%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DBALX and FSRKX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between DBALX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBALX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBALX
DBALX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBALXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

3.67

-2.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

5.19

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.74

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

8.94

-7.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

33.72

-26.99

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBALX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBALXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

3.67

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.93

-0.31

Drawdowns

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBALX drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBALX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBALXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-19.93%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-1.93%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-5.84%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-12.74%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-0.93%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-3.21%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.51%

+0.96%

Volatility

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.31%. This indicates that DBALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBALXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.31%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

3.68%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.30%

4.72%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

6.94%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.95%

7.80%

+2.15%

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBALX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBALX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

DBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FSRKX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
5.12%5.28%3.73%2.19%4.24%1.59%2.00%2.73%2.03%2.37%1.04%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.26%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBALX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBALX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to FSRKX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBALX dropped -27.89% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBALX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer