PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBALX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBALX achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.13% return.


DBALX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
3.04%
6M
4.34%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.72%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.90%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
3.04%9.88%7.98%7.81%-2.06%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.13%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DBALX and FRGAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.76

The correlation between DBALX and FRGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBALX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBALX
DBALX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBALXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

2.56

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

3.63

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.33

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

14.92

-8.20

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBALX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBALXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.56

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.53

-0.92

Drawdowns

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBALX drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBALX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBALXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-11.77%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-7.03%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-11.77%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

0.00%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-1.59%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.57%

-0.10%

Volatility

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davenport Balanced Income Fund (DBALX) is 1.59%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that DBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBALXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.75%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

7.21%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.30%

9.04%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

10.32%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.95%

10.32%

-0.37%

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBALX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBALX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

DBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBALX
Davenport Balanced Income Fund
5.12%5.28%3.73%2.19%4.24%1.59%2.00%2.73%2.03%2.37%1.04%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBALX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to DBALX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBALX dropped -27.89% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBALX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer