DAX vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DAX returned 9.68%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for SIL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

DAX vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 9.68%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.64% annualized return.

DAX

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -1.55%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

SIL

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: -10.87%
• YTD: -5.97%
• 6M: -10.24%
• 1Y: 65.33%
• 3Y*: 47.37%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAX vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	-1.81%	39.00%	10.55%	23.62%	-18.47%	7.73%	12.27%	22.11%	-22.92%	28.23%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-5.97%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and SIL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014	0.31

The correlation between DAX and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DAX vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAX	SIL
Industrials	34.1%	-
Financial Services	20.0%	-
Technology	15.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	-
Communication Services	6.2%	-
Healthcare	5.5%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	99.8%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

DAX vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 35
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAX vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAX	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.25	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	1.69	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.23	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	1.77	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	4.50	-3.70

DAX vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAX vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAX	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.58%	-82.99%	+37.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.82%	-37.08%	+22.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.03%	-37.08%	+21.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.92%	-49.48%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.58%	-63.04%	+17.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-33.47%	+27.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.48%	-51.37%	+40.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	14.58%	-9.76%

Volatility

DAX vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) is 5.25%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 19.47%. This indicates that DAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAX	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	19.47%	-14.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.86%	44.45%	-29.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.98%	52.59%	-34.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	39.84%	-19.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.98%	39.90%	-18.92%

DAX vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAX vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than SIL's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	1.50%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.26%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAX and SIL in my portfolio?

DAX and SIL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAX or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to DAX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, DAX or SIL?

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.68% vs 8.64% for SIL. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAX or SIL?

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAX or SIL?

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAX or SIL?

DAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.26% for SIL.

What is the main difference between DAX and SIL?

DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while SIL is Silver. DAX tracks DAX Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.