DAX vs. FXI
DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DAX returned 9.57%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for FXI. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
DAX vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 9.57%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.
DAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
DAX vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -1.45% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 12.27% | 22.11% | -22.92% | 28.23% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAX and FXI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014 | 0.48 |
DAX vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAX
FXI
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Industrials
DAX
FXI
Financial Services
DAX
FXI
Technology
DAX
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
DAX
FXI
Communication Services
DAX
FXI
Healthcare
DAX
FXI
Basic Materials
DAX
FXI
Utilities
DAX
FXI
Real Estate
DAX
FXI
Consumer Defensive
DAX
FXI
Energy
DAX
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAX vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
DAX
FXI
DAX vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.99 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.18 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | -0.38 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAX vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.58% | -72.68% | +27.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -16.03% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -28.72% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.72% | -54.94% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -60.81% | +15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -27.42% | +22.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -31.21% | +20.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 7.66% | -2.89% |
Volatility
DAX vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) is 5.86%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that DAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAX | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 6.22% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 14.30% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 19.90% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 31.67% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 27.64% | -6.39% |
DAX vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAX vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FXI's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.50% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAX and FXI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to DAX (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.57% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.50% for DAX.
DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while FXI is China Equities. DAX tracks DAX Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.74% for FXI.
DAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAX and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer