PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAX vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAX vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FDD's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has underperformed FDD with an annualized return of 8.97%, while FDD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


DAX

1D
-1.53%
1M
2.29%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
2.93%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.97%

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAX vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-0.66%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and FDD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014

0.79

The correlation between DAX and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DAX vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAX
FDD

Industrials

34.8%
12.5%

Financial Services

21.0%
52.2%

Technology

13.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
12.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
2.1%

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.3%
2.9%

Utilities

5.0%
6.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
3.7%

Energy

-

10.8%

Industrials

DAX
34.8%
FDD
12.5%

Financial Services

DAX
21.0%
FDD
52.2%

Technology

DAX
13.2%
FDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

DAX
7.0%
FDD
12.3%

Communication Services

DAX
6.1%
FDD
2.1%

Healthcare

DAX
5.7%
FDD

-

Basic Materials

DAX
5.3%
FDD
2.9%

Utilities

DAX
5.0%
FDD
6.0%

Real Estate

DAX
1.0%
FDD
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

DAX
0.9%
FDD
3.7%

Energy

DAX

-

FDD
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAX vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAX vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAXFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.37

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.53

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

11.86

-11.03

DAX vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAXFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

2.16

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.60

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.10

+0.26

Drawdowns

DAX vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAXFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-74.77%

+29.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-9.39%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-13.06%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

-35.11%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

-41.43%

-4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-2.26%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-35.47%

+24.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

2.79%

+1.89%

Volatility

DAX vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) at 5.22%. This indicates that DAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAXFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

5.22%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

12.35%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

15.43%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

18.39%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.16%

+1.12%

DAX vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAX vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.48%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAX and FDD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to FDD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 9.96% vs 8.97% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.

DAX tracks DAX Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.58% for FDD.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAX and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer