DAX vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DAX returned 9.57%/yr vs 5.36%/yr for CQQQ. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

DAX vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 9.57%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.

DAX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: -1.45%
• 6M: -0.46%
• 1Y: 2.74%
• 3Y*: 16.82%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -8.85%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: -8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAX vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	-1.45%	39.00%	10.55%	23.62%	-18.47%	7.73%	12.27%	22.11%	-22.92%	28.23%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-1.35%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and CQQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014	0.46

The correlation between DAX and CQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

DAX vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAX	CQQQ
Industrials	33.8%	1.3%
Financial Services	19.8%	0.1%
Technology	15.2%	58.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	13.8%
Communication Services	5.9%	21.9%
Healthcare	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	0.1%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

DAX vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAX vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAX	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	0.71	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	1.18	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.14	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	0.87	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	2.01	-1.43

DAX vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAX vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAX	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.58%	-73.99%	+28.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.82%	-24.41%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.03%	-35.93%	+19.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.72%	-66.96%	+27.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.58%	-73.99%	+28.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-51.07%	+45.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.49%	-28.32%	+17.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	10.60%	-5.83%

Volatility

DAX vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) is 5.86%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that DAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAX	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	10.63%	-4.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	22.55%	-7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	30.20%	-12.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	38.09%	-17.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	33.33%	-12.08%

DAX vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAX vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than CQQQ's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.20%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	1.50%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAX and CQQQ in my portfolio?

DAX and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAX or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to DAX (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which ETF is better, DAX or CQQQ?

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.57% vs 5.36% for CQQQ. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAX or CQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAX or CQQQ?

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAX or CQQQ?

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.50% for DAX.

What is the main difference between DAX and CQQQ?

DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while CQQQ is China Equities. DAX tracks DAX Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.