PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. XCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. XCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Fundx ETF (XCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 32.67% return, which is significantly higher than XCOR's 13.43% return.


DARP

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.18%
YTD
32.67%
6M
34.22%
1Y
82.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCOR

1D
-0.71%
1M
7.51%
YTD
13.43%
6M
14.00%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. XCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
32.67%40.19%24.63%6.25%
XCOR
Fundx ETF
13.43%12.50%29.57%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and XCOR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.84

The correlation between DARP and XCOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DARP vs. XCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DARP
XCOR

Technology

45.8%
39.0%

Communication Services

19.4%
12.2%

Industrials

12.0%
5.4%

Energy

9.9%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
10.4%

Utilities

5.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.1%

Healthcare

1.4%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

12.7%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

DARP
45.8%
XCOR
39.0%

Communication Services

DARP
19.4%
XCOR
12.2%

Industrials

DARP
12.0%
XCOR
5.4%

Energy

DARP
9.9%
XCOR
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DARP
6.6%
XCOR
10.4%

Utilities

DARP
5.4%
XCOR
2.4%

Basic Materials

DARP
4.7%
XCOR
2.1%

Healthcare

DARP
1.4%
XCOR
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

DARP

-

XCOR
4.9%

Financial Services

DARP

-

XCOR
12.7%

Real Estate

DARP

-

XCOR
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. XCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XCOR
XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. XCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Fundx ETF (XCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DARPXCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.41

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.03

3.08

+3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.75

13.62

+13.13

DARP vs. XCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the XCOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and XCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DARPXCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

2.30

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

1.27

+0.22

Drawdowns

DARP vs. XCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than XCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and XCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPXCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-22.54%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-9.60%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.71%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-3.12%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.17%

+0.93%

Volatility

DARP vs. XCOR - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Fundx ETF (XCOR) at 3.78%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPXCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

3.78%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.49%

10.17%

+7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

12.84%

+10.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.11%

17.05%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.11%

17.05%

+9.06%

DARP vs. XCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XCOR's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

DARP vs. XCOR - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XCOR's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.33%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%
XCOR
Fundx ETF
0.38%0.43%0.00%0.95%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and XCOR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to XCOR (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs XCOR's -22.54%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 82.62% vs 29.47% for XCOR. On fees, DARP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 82.62% return vs 29.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DARP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.

XCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.33% for DARP.

They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and FundX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 1.27% for XCOR.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and XCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer