PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPP vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DAPP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DAPP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
-9.74%15.03%44.87%285.02%-85.60%-38.65%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
7.00%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-4.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 7.00% return.


DAPP

1D
6.88%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
-9.74%
6M
-31.40%
1Y
65.23%
3Y*
49.37%
5Y*
10Y*

GDX

1D
6.97%
1M
-20.78%
YTD
7.00%
6M
20.99%
1Y
101.08%
3Y*
43.23%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAPP vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DAPP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAPPGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

2.21

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.45

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.34

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.72

12.07

-9.35

DAPP vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAPPGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.21

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.14

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and GDX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DAPP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.69%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and GDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPPGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-80.34%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.21%

-30.84%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.51%

-20.78%

-29.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.23%

-40.61%

-17.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.05%

8.52%

+13.53%

Volatility

DAPP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 19.45% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 18.51%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DAPPGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.45%

18.51%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.35%

38.19%

+12.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.96%

46.00%

+20.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.29%

35.73%

+37.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.29%

37.44%

+35.85%