PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPP vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAPP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -2.44% return.


DAPP

1D
-2.55%
1M
-7.32%
6M
13.81%
YTD
8.71%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
-5.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.85%

GDX

1D
7.39%
1M
6.27%
6M
-15.22%
YTD
-2.44%
1Y
49.29%
3Y*
43.13%
5Y*
21.96%
10Y*
11.81%
ALL TIME*
5.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.29M$5.87M$14.12M
$1.47B$1.40B$1.77B

DAPP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
8.71%15.03%44.87%285.02%-85.60%-45.88%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-2.44%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and GDX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.27

The correlation between DAPP and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAPP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAPP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DAPPGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.27

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

2.70

-2.35

DAPP vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPPGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.61%

-80.34%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.21%

-38.93%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.88%

-38.93%

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-46.51%

-45.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.64%

-27.76%

-17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-40.37%

-20.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.89%

18.30%

+8.59%

Volatility

DAPP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 20.81% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 13.71%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAPPGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

13.71%

+7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.77%

38.25%

+9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.27%

48.91%

+15.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.09%

37.41%

+35.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.67%

37.42%

+35.25%

DAPP vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAPP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.76%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAPP and GDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAPP has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to GDX (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPP dropped -92.61% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 21.96% vs -5.99% for DAPP. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 13.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 21.96% return vs -5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for DAPP.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

DAPP is categorized as Blockchain, while GDX is Gold. DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for DAPP and 0.51% for GDX.

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAPP and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer