DAMD vs. DOG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DAMD (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - DAMD tracks the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAMD charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.

Performance

DAMD vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAMD achieves a -90.01% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -4.36% return.

DAMD

• 1D: 21.08%
• 1M: -30.23%
• YTD: -90.01%
• 6M: -89.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DOG

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: -4.36%
• 6M: -4.24%
• 1Y: -13.37%
• 3Y*: -8.54%
• 5Y*: -5.36%
• 10Y*: -11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAMD vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF	-90.01%	22.15%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-4.36%	-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DAMD and DOG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

DAMD vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAMD vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAMD	DOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	-0.57	-0.14

Drawdowns

DAMD vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAMD drawdown since its inception was -93.52%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAMD and DOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAMD	DOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.52%	-92.73%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.57%	-92.62%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.60%	-66.40%	+26.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DAMD	DOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.28%	12.32%	+125.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.28%	14.81%	+123.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.28%	17.50%	+120.78%

DAMD vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAMD has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAMD vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

DAMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.50%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAMD and DOG in my portfolio?

DAMD and DOG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DAMD or DOG?

On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAMD or DOG?

DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DAMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAMD or DOG?

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for DAMD.

What is the main difference between DAMD and DOG?

DAMD tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DAMD and 0.95% for DOG.