DAMD vs. DOG
DAMD (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - DAMD tracks the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAMD charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
DAMD vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAMD achieves a -92.84% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -6.92% return.
DAMD
- 1D
- 11.32%
- 1M
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -91.69%
- YTD
- -92.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- -12.40%
- 3Y*
- -8.71%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- -11.03%
DAMD vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF | -92.84% | 13.18% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -6.92% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAMD and DOG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAMD vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
DAMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOG
DAMD vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF (DAMD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAMD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAMD vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAMD drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAMD and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAMD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -92.90% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.96% | -92.82% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -66.53% | +18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.14% | — |
Volatility
DAMD vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAMD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.63% | 12.29% | +128.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.63% | 14.82% | +125.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.63% | 17.46% | +123.17% |
DAMD vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAMD has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAMD vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
DAMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAMD Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.39% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAMD and DOG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DAMD.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for DAMD.
DAMD tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DAMD and 0.95% for DOG.
Find the right allocation for DAMD and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer