DAGVX vs. WMFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DAGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund) and WMFFX (Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX returned 13.51%/yr vs 13.00%/yr for WMFFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DAGVX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for WMFFX.

Performance

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than WMFFX's 5.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DAGVX having a 13.51% annualized return and WMFFX not far behind at 13.00%.

DAGVX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 14.05%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: 19.73%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

WMFFX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	14.05%	18.20%	14.16%	12.54%	1.43%	30.90%	3.66%	26.74%	-10.76%	14.78%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	5.96%	17.42%	19.24%	16.96%	-8.27%	28.71%	7.89%	25.03%	-5.98%	20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and WMFFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.93

The correlation between DAGVX and WMFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. WMFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX

DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 79
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

WMFFX

WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAGVX	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.80	+0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.56	+1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	2.21	+2.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.85	9.58	+7.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the WMFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and WMFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAGVX	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.80	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.86	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.80	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.60	-0.02

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than WMFFX's maximum drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and WMFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAGVX	WMFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.04%	-47.21%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	-8.36%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-14.64%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-18.53%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.62%	-34.63%	-7.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-5.36%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.93%	-0.13%

Volatility

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAGVX	WMFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	2.42%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	7.89%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	10.32%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	14.11%	+1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	16.33%	+2.50%

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than WMFFX's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than WMFFX's 9.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	5.86%	6.69%	6.85%	5.09%	7.96%	21.64%	2.64%	3.29%	17.81%	10.71%	2.72%	15.78%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	9.74%	10.28%	10.27%	5.92%	6.53%	6.24%	3.26%	6.33%	4.59%	7.43%	6.56%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAGVX and WMFFX in my portfolio?

DAGVX and WMFFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAGVX or WMFFX?

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to WMFFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs WMFFX's -47.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.