DAGVX vs. WMFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. WMFFX is a passively managed fund by American Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 5, 2008.
Performance
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | -3.14% | 17.42% | 19.24% | 16.96% | -8.27% | 28.71% | 7.89% | 25.03% | -5.98% | 20.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than WMFFX's -3.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DAGVX having a 12.72% annualized return and WMFFX not far behind at 12.23%.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
WMFFX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than WMFFX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. WMFFX — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
WMFFX
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGVX | WMFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.88 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 6.09 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGVX | WMFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.88 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and WMFFX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than WMFFX's 10.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | 10.65% | 10.28% | 10.27% | 5.92% | 6.53% | 6.24% | 3.26% | 6.33% | 4.59% | 7.43% | 6.56% | 6.44% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than WMFFX's maximum drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and WMFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | WMFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -47.21% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -10.37% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -18.53% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -34.63% | -7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -6.33% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -5.40% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. WMFFX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) at 4.41%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | WMFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.41% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 8.28% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 15.31% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 14.13% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 16.33% | +2.49% |