PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAGVX vs. PEOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund (PEOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than PEOPX's 11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has underperformed PEOPX with an annualized return of 13.51%, while PEOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.


DAGVX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.05%
6M
15.50%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
13.51%

PEOPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.54%
1Y
28.42%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
14.05%18.20%14.16%12.54%1.43%30.90%3.66%26.74%-10.76%14.78%
PEOPX
BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund
11.50%17.33%24.50%25.78%-18.67%28.25%17.83%30.96%-6.01%21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and PEOPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1995

0.90

The correlation between DAGVX and PEOPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. PEOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX
DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PEOPX
PEOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PEOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PEOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund (PEOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAGVXPEOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

3.26

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.85

15.20

+1.66

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the PEOPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and PEOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAGVXPEOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.47

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.82

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, roughly equal to the maximum PEOPX drawdown of -57.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and PEOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAGVXPEOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-57.45%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-8.97%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-18.80%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-24.79%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.62%

-33.85%

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-10.51%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.92%

-0.12%

Volatility

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund (PEOPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAGVXPEOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.83%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

8.97%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

11.86%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

16.91%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

17.97%

+0.86%

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than PEOPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAGVX vs. PEOPX - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than PEOPX's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
5.86%6.69%6.85%5.09%7.96%21.64%2.64%3.29%17.81%10.71%2.72%15.78%
PEOPX
BNY Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund
9.28%10.35%10.38%7.35%11.78%12.89%11.94%14.37%14.75%9.21%10.90%7.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAGVX and PEOPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PEOPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs PEOPX's -57.45%.

DAGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAGVX and PEOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer