DAGVX vs. MDLVX
DAGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund) and MDLVX (BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX returned 13.78%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for MDLVX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DAGVX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MDLVX.
Performance
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly lower than MDLVX's 23.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed MDLVX with an annualized return of 13.78%, while MDLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- YTD
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
MDLVX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 39.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 17.33% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
MDLVX BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A | 23.18% | 18.11% | 15.08% | 13.43% | -8.89% | 26.20% | 3.64% | 24.39% | -7.94% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and MDLVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1999 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DAGVX and MDLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. MDLVX — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
MDLVX
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A (MDLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAGVX | MDLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.60 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 5.78 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | 26.84 | -10.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, roughly equal to the maximum MDLVX drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and MDLVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | MDLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -55.49% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -6.54% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | -16.19% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -19.87% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -37.11% | -5.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -8.91% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.41% | +0.33% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A (MDLVX) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | MDLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.81% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 8.90% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 11.38% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 14.77% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 17.23% | +1.51% |
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MDLVX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. MDLVX - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than MDLVX's 10.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 5.70% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
MDLVX BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A | 10.71% | 9.33% | 14.55% | 2.68% | 5.86% | 17.69% | 1.49% | 3.76% | 12.92% | 0.43% | 1.06% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DAGVX and MDLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DAGVX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to MDLVX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs MDLVX's -55.49%.
MDLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAGVX and MDLVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer