PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAGVX vs. DREVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than DREVX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has underperformed DREVX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while DREVX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.79% annualized return.


DAGVX

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.12%
YTD
13.66%
6M
15.03%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.47%

DREVX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.89%
YTD
6.74%
6M
7.34%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
13.66%18.20%14.16%12.54%1.43%30.90%3.66%26.74%-10.76%14.78%
DREVX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund
6.74%16.70%27.17%31.07%-17.94%27.17%26.52%27.09%-1.29%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and DREVX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1995

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between DAGVX and DREVX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. DREVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX
DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DREVX
DREVX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DREVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DREVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAGVXDREVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

1.96

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

8.27

+7.84

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the DREVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and DREVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAGVXDREVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.68

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.78

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.38

+0.20

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, roughly equal to the maximum DREVX drawdown of -54.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and DREVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAGVXDREVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-54.68%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-11.41%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-22.52%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-24.69%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.62%

-32.25%

-10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.82%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-13.01%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.70%

-0.89%

Volatility

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX) at 3.23%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DREVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAGVXDREVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.23%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

10.11%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

13.36%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

18.68%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

18.94%

-0.11%

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than DREVX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAGVX vs. DREVX - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than DREVX's 9.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
5.88%6.69%6.85%5.09%7.96%21.64%2.64%3.29%17.81%10.71%2.72%15.78%
DREVX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund
9.91%12.89%8.77%5.12%4.82%11.43%6.28%6.74%9.01%9.11%8.71%11.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAGVX and DREVX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to DREVX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs DREVX's -54.68%.

DAGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAGVX and DREVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer