PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAGVX vs. DITEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than DITEX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed DITEX with an annualized return of 13.51%, while DITEX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.94% annualized return.


DAGVX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.05%
6M
15.50%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
13.51%

DITEX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
14.05%18.20%14.16%12.54%1.43%30.90%3.66%26.74%-10.76%14.78%
DITEX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.15%5.56%1.21%5.35%-7.61%0.43%4.29%7.35%0.78%4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DAGVX and DITEX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1995

-0.09

The correlation between DAGVX and DITEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAGVX vs. DITEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAGVX
DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DITEX
DITEX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAGVXDITEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.77

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.20

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.85

7.25

+9.60

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the DITEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAGVX and DITEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAGVXDITEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.94

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.33

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.16

-0.58

Drawdowns

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than DITEX's maximum drawdown of -12.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and DITEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAGVXDITEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-12.03%

-43.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-2.99%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-4.35%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-11.99%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.62%

-11.99%

-30.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-1.92%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.91%

+0.89%

Volatility

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX) at 0.90%. This indicates that DAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DITEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAGVXDITEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

0.90%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

1.80%

+7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

2.24%

+9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

3.11%

+12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

3.39%

+15.44%

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than DITEX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAGVX vs. DITEX - Dividend Comparison

DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than DITEX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
5.86%6.69%6.85%5.09%7.96%21.64%2.64%3.29%17.81%10.71%2.72%15.78%
DITEX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.91%3.46%2.86%2.38%2.11%2.03%2.51%3.38%3.47%2.99%3.69%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAGVX and DITEX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to DITEX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAGVX dropped -55.04% vs DITEX's -12.03%.

DITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAGVX and DITEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer