DAGVX vs. DBMYX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX).
DAGVX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. DBMYX is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2013.
Performance
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 2.23% | 18.20% | 14.16% | 12.54% | 1.43% | 30.90% | 3.66% | 26.74% | -10.76% | 14.78% |
DBMYX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y | -4.63% | 11.94% | 10.09% | 15.63% | -33.11% | -4.44% | 68.62% | 39.27% | -1.35% | 26.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGVX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than DBMYX's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, DAGVX has outperformed DBMYX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while DBMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.
DAGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
DBMYX
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -4.63%
- 6M
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAGVX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAGVX vs. DBMYX — Risk / Return Rank
DAGVX
DBMYX
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.71 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.18 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.85 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 3.29 | +3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.71 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.10 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.45 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.40 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGVX and DBMYX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Dividend Comparison
DAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than DBMYX's 53.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund | 6.54% | 6.69% | 6.85% | 5.09% | 7.96% | 21.64% | 2.64% | 3.29% | 17.81% | 10.71% | 2.72% | 15.78% |
DBMYX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y | 53.67% | 51.19% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.97% | 7.86% | 0.00% | 8.66% | 9.12% | 2.20% | 6.55% |
Drawdowns
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGVX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than DBMYX's maximum drawdown of -48.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGVX and DBMYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -48.24% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -19.58% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -45.79% | +28.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.62% | -48.24% | +5.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -23.16% | +18.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -15.18% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 5.07% | -2.30% |
Volatility
DAGVX vs. DBMYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) is 4.71%, while BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that DAGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 9.05% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 16.13% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 24.69% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 24.54% | -8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 24.16% | -5.34% |