PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAMDX vs. DCEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX) and Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAMDX achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than DCEMX's 35.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DAMDX has underperformed DCEMX with an annualized return of 3.20%, while DCEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.


DAMDX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
2.08%
6M
2.17%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
3.20%

DCEMX

1D
1.29%
1M
7.63%
YTD
35.90%
6M
37.25%
1Y
61.21%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAMDX
Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund
2.08%7.93%5.29%4.06%0.57%0.12%0.44%5.54%-1.01%4.08%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
35.90%28.90%4.84%6.16%-25.20%-7.30%23.89%21.88%-20.99%32.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DAMDX and DCEMX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between DAMDX and DCEMX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAMDX vs. DCEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAMDX
DAMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DAMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DAMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DCEMX
DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX) and Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DAMDXDCEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.48

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

4.45

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.92

15.89

+16.03

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAMDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is comparable to the DCEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAMDX and DCEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAMDX drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, roughly equal to the maximum DCEMX drawdown of -70.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAMDX and DCEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAMDXDCEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.68%

-70.65%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-13.89%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-16.83%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.30%

-40.74%

+33.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.44%

-45.88%

+37.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.95%

0.00%

-34.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-26.09%

-22.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

3.89%

-3.69%

Volatility

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX) is 1.09%, while Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a volatility of 12.18%. This indicates that DAMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAMDXDCEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

12.18%

-11.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

20.93%

-19.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

23.51%

-21.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

18.79%

-14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

18.55%

-14.55%

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAMDX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DCEMX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAMDX vs. DCEMX - Dividend Comparison

DAMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than DCEMX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAMDX
Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund
7.59%7.83%8.84%8.77%5.35%3.47%3.64%6.31%4.86%4.27%3.54%4.39%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
1.59%2.17%0.00%0.12%0.00%9.47%0.00%0.26%1.00%0.38%1.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAMDX and DCEMX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCEMX has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to DAMDX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAMDX dropped -69.68% vs DCEMX's -70.65%.

DAMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAMDX and DCEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer