DABS vs. XLEI
DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while XLEI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector. DABS is actively managed, while XLEI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.
Performance
DABS vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 20.42% return.
DABS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 0.88% | 3.15% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 20.42% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DABS and XLEI is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DABS vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank
DABS
XLEI
DABS vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DABS | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DABS | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 2.65 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
DABS vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum XLEI drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and XLEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DABS | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -7.98% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.97% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -1.52% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
DABS vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DABS | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 13.16% | -10.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 13.16% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 13.16% | -10.60% |
DABS vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DABS vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison
DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than XLEI's 16.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.89% | 3.81% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 16.59% | 10.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DABS and XLEI have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.
XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 4.89% for DABS.
DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while XLEI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.35% for XLEI.
Find the right allocation for DABS and XLEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer