DABS vs. RFIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DABS returned 3.97% vs -17.05% for RFIX. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RFIX.

Performance

DABS vs. RFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than RFIX's 3.26% return.

DABS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 1.18%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.08%

RFIX

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -3.96%
• 6M: 3.83%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 1Y: -17.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -23.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	$488.99K	$528.18K	$1.01M
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF	$6.31M	$8.41M	$16.55M

DABS vs. RFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	1.56%	5.63%
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF	3.26%	-33.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DABS and RFIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

DABS vs. RFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 74
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RFIX

RFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3
RFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
RFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
RFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DABS vs. RFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DABS	RFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	-0.58	+2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	-0.69	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.93	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	-0.82	+3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	-1.51	+12.08

DABS vs. RFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the RFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and RFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DABS vs. RFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum RFIX drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and RFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DABS	RFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-38.79%	+37.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-20.76%	+19.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-35.21%	+35.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-24.92%	+24.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	12.23%	-11.85%

Volatility

DABS vs. RFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.52%, while Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DABS	RFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	6.28%	-5.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.68%	20.52%	-18.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34%	29.35%	-27.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.51%	30.61%	-28.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.51%	30.61%	-28.10%

DABS vs. RFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DABS vs. RFIX - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than RFIX's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.87%	3.81%
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF	4.43%	5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DABS and RFIX in my portfolio?

DABS and RFIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DABS or RFIX?

RFIX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to DABS (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs RFIX's -38.79%.

Which ETF is better, DABS or RFIX?

On 1-year performance, DABS leads with 3.97% vs -17.05% for RFIX. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DABS or RFIX?

Over the 1-year period, DABS has performed better with a 3.97% return vs -17.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DABS or RFIX?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RFIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DABS or RFIX?

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 4.43% for RFIX.

What is the main difference between DABS and RFIX?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.50% for RFIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.