DABS vs. DCMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and DCMB (Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DCMB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DABS returned 5.66% vs 4.74% for DCMB. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

DABS vs. DCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than DCMB's 1.39% return.

DABS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMB

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 6.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. DCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	0.88%	5.63%
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF	1.39%	4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DABS and DCMB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

DABS vs. DCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 78
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

DCMB

DCMB Risk / Return Rank: 96
DCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. DCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DABS	DCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	4.16	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	7.17	-3.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.96	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	6.98	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	25.78	-10.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DABS vs. DCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the DCMB Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and DCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DABS	DCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	4.16	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	3.90	-1.85

Drawdowns

DABS vs. DCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, which is greater than DCMB's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and DCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DABS	DCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-0.84%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-0.68%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.20%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-0.11%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.18%	+0.19%

Volatility

DABS vs. DCMB - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) at 0.47%. This indicates that DABS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DABS	DCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	0.47%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.60%	0.88%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49%	1.14%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.56%	1.58%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.56%	1.58%	+0.98%

DABS vs. DCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DABS and DCMB have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

DABS vs. DCMB - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than DCMB's 4.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.89%	3.81%	0.00%	0.00%
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF	4.75%	4.84%	5.52%	3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DABS and DCMB in my portfolio?

DABS and DCMB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DABS or DCMB?

DABS has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to DCMB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs DCMB's -0.84%.

Which ETF is better, DABS or DCMB?

On 1-year performance, DABS leads with 5.66% vs 4.74% for DCMB. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, DCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DABS or DCMB?

Over the 1-year period, DABS has performed better with a 5.66% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DABS or DCMB?

DABS and DCMB have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DABS or DCMB?

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 4.75% for DCMB.

What is the main difference between DABS and DCMB?

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while DCMB is Short-Term Bond.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.