DAADX vs. GSIYX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DAADX (DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio) and GSIYX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - DAADX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while GSIYX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World ex USA Growth (Net). Over the past 3 years, DAADX returned 20.22%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for GSIYX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DAADX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSIYX.

Performance

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAADX achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly higher than GSIYX's 8.15% return.

DAADX

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 14.17%
• YTD: 23.85%
• 1Y: 41.94%
• 3Y*: 20.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.15%

GSIYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.02%
• 6M: 3.76%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 1Y: 15.65%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	23.85%	27.59%	3.44%	24.58%	-15.81%	0.20%
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	8.15%	20.89%	9.69%	22.07%	-10.99%	-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DAADX and GSIYX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between DAADX and GSIYX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DAADX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DAADX

DAADX Risk / Return Rank: 69
DAADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DAADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DAADX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DAADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DAADX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GSIYX

GSIYX Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GSIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
GSIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
GSIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
GSIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAADX	GSIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.60	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.20	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.29	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.01	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	5.50	+3.32

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the GSIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAADX and GSIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAADX drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum GSIYX drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAADX and GSIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAADX	GSIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.98%	-28.79%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.99%	-7.81%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-10.30%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.15%	-2.17%	-9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-4.80%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	2.85%	+1.77%

Volatility

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 2.66%. This indicates that DAADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAADX	GSIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.93%	2.66%	+7.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.76%	8.18%	+13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.96%	9.86%	+13.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	14.26%	+1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	15.62%	+0.38%

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAADX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAADX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison

DAADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than GSIYX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	2.03%	2.28%	2.64%	2.82%	3.02%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	4.76%	5.14%	11.21%	2.38%	4.91%	2.25%	0.19%	0.67%	0.55%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAADX and GSIYX in my portfolio?

DAADX and GSIYX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAADX or GSIYX?

DAADX has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to GSIYX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAADX dropped -24.98% vs GSIYX's -28.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.