D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

D6RQ.DE (Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF) and LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - D6RQ.DE tracks the MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select while LYYB.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, D6RQ.DE returned 15.26%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for LYYB.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. D6RQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LYYB.DE.

Performance

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, D6RQ.DE achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than LYYB.DE's 11.42% return.

D6RQ.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 14.01%
• YTD: 12.69%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 21.30%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.23%

LYYB.DE

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 11.30%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 1Y: 21.08%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: 13.66%
• ALL TIME*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	12.69%	4.36%	42.08%	34.15%	-22.07%	41.44%	17.63%
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist	11.42%	2.83%	31.27%	22.21%	-17.02%	38.79%	14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020	0.93

The correlation between D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D6RQ.DE

D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LYYB.DE

LYYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 70
LYYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
LYYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LYYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LYYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LYYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	D6RQ.DE	LYYB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.75	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.40	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.52	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	8.51	-2.40

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the LYYB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, smaller than the maximum LYYB.DE drawdown of -53.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	D6RQ.DE	LYYB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.29%	-53.38%	+26.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-8.32%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.29%	-24.11%	-3.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-24.11%	-3.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-1.02%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-9.09%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.30%	2.47%	+1.83%

Volatility

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) at 3.08%. This indicates that D6RQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	D6RQ.DE	LYYB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	3.08%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.02%	8.03%	+2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	12.04%	+3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	15.64%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	16.31%	+1.25%

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

D6RQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LYYB.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

D6RQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Dividend Comparison

D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than LYYB.DE's 0.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	0.38%	0.53%	0.39%	0.60%	0.80%	0.46%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist	0.81%	0.99%	0.78%	0.00%	1.12%	0.95%	1.31%	1.14%	1.81%	1.64%	1.87%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, D6RQ.DE or LYYB.DE?

On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, D6RQ.DE or LYYB.DE?

LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

What is the main difference between D6RQ.DE and LYYB.DE?

D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select, while LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for D6RQ.DE and 0.09% for LYYB.DE.