PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

D5BM.DE is traded in EUR, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with D5BM.DE having a 11.37% return and SPXP.L slightly higher at 11.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with D5BM.DE having a 15.17% annualized return and SPXP.L not far behind at 15.06%.


D5BM.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.39%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
15.17%

SPXP.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.54%
6M
11.60%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
15.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
D5BM.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
11.37%4.79%32.48%22.66%-14.28%41.10%7.10%34.88%-0.79%7.04%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.56%3.82%33.74%22.61%-13.49%39.80%7.72%34.83%-0.97%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between D5BM.DE and SPXP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.80

The correlation between D5BM.DE and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

D5BM.DE
D5BM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
D5BM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


D5BM.DESPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.61

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

13.11

-0.35

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current D5BM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of D5BM.DE and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


D5BM.DESPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.32

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.00

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.98

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.02

-0.11

Drawdowns

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum D5BM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.77%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -32.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D5BM.DE and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


D5BM.DESPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.77%

-32.89%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-7.14%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-22.38%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.22%

-22.38%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-32.89%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.39%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-4.36%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.97%

+0.04%

Volatility

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.19%. This indicates that D5BM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


D5BM.DESPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.19%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

7.46%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.12%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

15.02%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.75%

-0.69%

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

D5BM.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

D5BM.DE vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither D5BM.DE nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, D5BM.DE and SPXP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for D5BM.DE.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for D5BM.DE and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for D5BM.DE and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer