D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE).
D5BM.DE and SPY5.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. D5BM.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500®. It was launched on Mar 26, 2010. SPY5.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500®. It was launched on Mar 19, 2012. Both D5BM.DE and SPY5.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: D5BM.DE or SPY5.DE.
Key characteristics
| D5BM.DE | SPY5.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.52% | 30.42% |
| 1Y Return | 38.34% | 38.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.75% | 12.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.36% | 16.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.88% | 14.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.06 | 3.04 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.16 | 4.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.37 | 4.42 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.61 | 19.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.86% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.88% | 11.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.77% | -33.86% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between D5BM.DE and SPY5.DE is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with D5BM.DE having a 30.52% return and SPY5.DE slightly lower at 30.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with D5BM.DE having a 14.88% annualized return and SPY5.DE not far behind at 14.82%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
D5BM.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Dividend Comparison
D5BM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D5BM.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY5.DE SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 1.01% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 3.30% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 1.39% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum D5BM.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.77%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY5.DE drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D5BM.DE and SPY5.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
D5BM.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (D5BM.DE) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.