PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZMVX vs. HDCTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Rational Equity Armor Fund (HDCTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMVX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than HDCTX's 8.57% return.


CZMVX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.40%
YTD
10.68%
6M
9.89%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

HDCTX

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
8.57%
6M
7.87%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
5.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
10.68%12.82%12.90%11.85%-7.94%25.55%5.88%28.61%-9.10%17.86%
HDCTX
Rational Equity Armor Fund
8.57%12.64%16.85%2.95%-10.68%14.52%15.85%11.32%-11.94%-2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMVX and HDCTX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between CZMVX and HDCTX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZMVX vs. HDCTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMVX
CZMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CZMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HDCTX
HDCTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HDCTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDCTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDCTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HDCTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDCTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Rational Equity Armor Fund (HDCTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CZMVXHDCTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.34

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

5.97

+6.08

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the HDCTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMVX and HDCTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum HDCTX drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and HDCTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZMVXHDCTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.43%

-59.05%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.95%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-11.74%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-18.22%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-3.23%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-6.40%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.72%

-1.10%

Volatility

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) is 2.51%, while Rational Equity Armor Fund (HDCTX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that CZMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDCTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZMVXHDCTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

3.07%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

7.23%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

9.64%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

10.68%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

11.54%

+6.09%

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HDCTX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CZMVX vs. HDCTX - Dividend Comparison

CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.93%, more than HDCTX's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
13.93%15.46%9.03%6.53%11.79%8.01%2.45%3.62%8.47%4.76%0.00%0.00%
HDCTX
Rational Equity Armor Fund
0.19%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.78%1.21%1.10%5.37%7.86%5.60%3.28%15.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CZMVX and HDCTX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDCTX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to CZMVX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMVX dropped -37.43% vs HDCTX's -59.05%.

CZMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZMVX and HDCTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer