CZMVX vs. FLCCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CZMVX (Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund) and FLCCX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CZMVX returned 8.81%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for FLCCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CZMVX charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for FLCCX.

Performance

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CZMVX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 9.62%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 20.49%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: —

FLCCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund	9.62%	12.82%	12.90%	11.85%	-7.94%	25.55%	5.88%	28.61%	-9.10%	17.86%
FLCCX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C	0.00%	18.58%	25.08%	22.21%	-8.85%	24.54%	7.70%	30.36%	-9.25%	14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMVX and FLCCX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between CZMVX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CZMVX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMVX

CZMVX Risk / Return Rank: 60
CZMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CZMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CZMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CZMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CZMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FLCCX

FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CZMVX	FLCCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.73	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.43	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	2.73	+0.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	4.65	+8.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMVX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CZMVX	FLCCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.73	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.71	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.43	+0.20

Drawdowns

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and FLCCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CZMVX	FLCCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.43%	-65.81%	+28.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-5.10%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-19.06%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.85%	-22.04%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.23%	+4.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-15.48%	+10.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.82%	-1.20%

Volatility

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CZMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CZMVX	FLCCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	0.00%	+2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	4.21%	+3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	8.06%	+2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	16.44%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	18.59%	-0.91%

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

CZMVX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.08%, more than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund	14.08%	15.46%	9.03%	6.53%	11.79%	8.01%	2.45%	3.62%	8.47%	4.76%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCCX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C	6.79%	6.79%	6.81%	3.27%	1.77%	6.87%	5.44%	8.90%	18.35%	7.06%	1.65%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CZMVX and FLCCX in my portfolio?

CZMVX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CZMVX or FLCCX?

CZMVX has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMVX dropped -37.43% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CZMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.