PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZMVX vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMVX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than BDMIX's 9.95% return.


CZMVX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.40%
YTD
10.68%
6M
9.89%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

BDMIX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.87%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
10.68%12.82%12.90%11.85%-7.94%25.55%5.88%28.61%-9.10%17.86%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
9.95%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%2.20%11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMVX and BDMIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.05

The correlation between CZMVX and BDMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZMVX vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMVX
CZMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CZMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CZMVXBDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

6.23

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

17.01

-4.96

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMVX and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZMVXBDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.43%

-11.89%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-3.24%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-4.07%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-5.31%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.91%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-2.67%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.18%

+0.44%

Volatility

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) is 2.51%, while BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that CZMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZMVXBDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

3.01%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

5.04%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

7.23%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

6.60%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

5.86%

+11.77%

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMIX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

CZMVX vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.93%, more than BDMIX's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
8.13%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
13.93%15.46%9.03%6.53%11.79%8.01%2.45%3.62%8.47%4.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CZMVX and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMIX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to CZMVX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMVX dropped -37.43% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZMVX and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer