CZMVX vs. ACTIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX).

CZMVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 3, 2017. ACTIX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Feb 1, 2021.

Performance

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund	2.83%	12.82%	12.90%	11.85%	-7.94%	13.95%
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund	-0.73%	6.08%	3.07%	5.97%	-9.94%	0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMVX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than ACTIX's -0.73% return.

CZMVX

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -4.34%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 5.95%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: —

ACTIX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.49%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: 0.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTIX's 2.09% expense ratio.

ACTIX

Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund

CZMVX

Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund

Return for Risk

CZMVX vs. ACTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMVX

CZMVX Risk / Return Rank: 41
CZMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CZMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CZMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CZMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CZMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ACTIX

ACTIX Risk / Return Rank: 34
ACTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ACTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ACTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ACTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ACTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CZMVX	ACTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.80	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.13	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.16	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.82	4.50	+1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the ACTIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMVX and ACTIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CZMVX	ACTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.80	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.00	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.00	+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between CZMVX and ACTIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Dividend Comparison

CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.01%, more than ACTIX's 3.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund	15.01%	15.46%	9.03%	6.53%	11.79%	8.01%	2.45%	3.62%	8.47%	4.76%
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund	3.11%	3.09%	3.18%	2.44%	1.10%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum ACTIX drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and ACTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CZMVX	ACTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.43%	-96.41%	+58.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-3.07%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.85%	-96.41%	+76.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.52%	-96.17%	+91.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-27.61%	+22.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	0.86%	+1.72%

Volatility

CZMVX vs. ACTIX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX) at 1.97%. This indicates that CZMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CZMVX	ACTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	1.97%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	2.58%	+5.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	4.71%	+10.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.87%	1,202.55%	-1,187.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	1,200.64%	-1,182.84%