CZAR vs. UGA
CZAR (Themes Natural Monopoly ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CZAR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CZAR returned 2.80% vs 79.48% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CZAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
CZAR vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZAR achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
CZAR
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
CZAR vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF | -0.86% | 13.32% | 10.92% | 2.34% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CZAR and UGA is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | -0.08 |
The correlation between CZAR and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CZAR vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
CZAR
UGA
CZAR vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CZAR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.37 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 5.37 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 12.86 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CZAR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 2.27 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.12 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
CZAR vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZAR drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZAR and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZAR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.38% | -86.59% | +73.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -14.88% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -14.75% | +11.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -36.76% | +34.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 6.20% | -3.14% |
Volatility
CZAR vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) is 2.98%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that CZAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CZAR | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 11.64% | -8.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 30.48% | -20.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 35.27% | -23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 34.40% | -19.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 37.27% | -22.24% |
CZAR vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CZAR vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
CZAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF | 1.48% | 1.47% | 0.94% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CZAR and UGA have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to CZAR (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZAR dropped -13.38% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs 2.80% for CZAR. On fees, CZAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CZAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CZAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
CZAR has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
CZAR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. CZAR tracks Solactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CZAR and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CZAR and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer