CZAMX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund (CZAMX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
CZAMX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 2, 2017. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZAMX Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund | 1.85% | 4.59% | 1.99% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 0.80% | 5.78% | 6.09% | -3.16% | 0.44% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 33.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZAMX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -6.10% return.
CZAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZAMX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CZAMX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
CZAMX
CTCAX
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund (CZAMX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CZAMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 1.24 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.84 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.30 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 8.07 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CZAMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.24 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.50 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.71 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CZAMX and CTCAX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
CZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZAMX Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund | 3.15% | 3.20% | 2.11% | 2.60% | 7.74% | 1.44% | 0.89% | 2.11% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZAMX drawdown since its inception was -7.16%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZAMX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZAMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -61.04% | +53.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -14.43% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.52% | -39.55% | +34.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -10.51% | +9.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -10.75% | +9.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 4.12% | -3.07% |
Volatility
CZAMX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund (CZAMX) is 1.01%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that CZAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CZAMX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 8.94% | -7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 16.85% | -14.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 27.31% | -23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.37% | 25.88% | -22.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.37% | 24.70% | -21.33% |