PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYSE.L vs. KROP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CYSE.L is traded in GBp, while KROP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYSE.L achieves a 39.03% return, which is significantly higher than KROP.L's 14.55% return.


CYSE.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
20.43%
6M
40.95%
YTD
39.03%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

KROP.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.33%
6M
5.31%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
-2.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CYSE.L
WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc
39.03%-8.72%13.36%60.49%-27.60%
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.55%-0.05%-6.73%-26.39%-15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CYSE.L and KROP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between CYSE.L and KROP.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYSE.L
CYSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CYSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYSE.LKROP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.21

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

2.24

-0.44

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYSE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the KROP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYSE.L and KROP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYSE.L drawdown since its inception was -46.68%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYSE.L and KROP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYSE.LKROP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.68%

-50.76%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.22%

-8.40%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.88%

-26.67%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-39.25%

+36.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-34.56%

+15.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.97%

4.53%

+9.44%

Volatility

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) at 4.68%. This indicates that CYSE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYSE.LKROP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

4.68%

+6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.35%

13.26%

+17.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.09%

16.71%

+17.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.72%

20.21%

+11.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

20.21%

+11.29%

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYSE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYSE.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CYSE.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CYSE.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CYSE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CYSE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

CYSE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CYSE.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYSE.L and KROP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer