CYPIX vs. UGPIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CYPIX (ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, CYPIX returned 13.59%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for UGPIX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYPIX charges 1.54%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.

Performance

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYPIX achieves a -7.68% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -42.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CYPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.

CYPIX

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: -7.68%
• 6M: -10.90%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: 13.59%

UGPIX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -20.25%
• YTD: -42.32%
• 6M: -43.54%
• 1Y: -32.35%
• 3Y*: -11.92%
• 5Y*: -1.07%
• 10Y*: 7.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CYPIX ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund	-7.68%	4.38%	34.15%	46.89%	-45.26%	29.22%	39.07%	37.98%	-1.09%	25.72%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	-42.32%	36.28%	-21.79%	785.09%	-53.03%	-73.86%	76.47%	40.07%	-46.51%	105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CYPIX and UGPIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.39

The correlation between CYPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CYPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYPIX

CYPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5
CYPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CYPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CYPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CYPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CYPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

UGPIX

UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CYPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	-0.59	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	-0.64	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.93	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	-0.50	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	-0.97	+2.15

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYPIX drawdown since its inception was -72.09%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYPIX and UGPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CYPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.09%	-98.56%	+26.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.57%	-60.87%	+38.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.71%	-60.87%	+23.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.00%	-92.61%	+45.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.00%	-96.22%	+49.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.19%	-83.59%	+70.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-79.75%	+65.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.00%	31.47%	-23.47%

Volatility

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund (CYPIX) is 9.81%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that CYPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CYPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	12.07%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.89%	37.08%	-16.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.89%	52.21%	-24.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.01%	388.15%	-354.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.95%	276.56%	-245.61%

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYPIX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

CYPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

CYPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CYPIX ProFunds Consumer Services Ultra Sector Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	18.51%	3.71%	0.00%	5.29%	0.00%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	10.48%	6.05%	2.91%	3.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CYPIX and UGPIX in my portfolio?

CYPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CYPIX or UGPIX?

UGPIX has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to CYPIX (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYPIX dropped -72.09% vs UGPIX's -98.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CYPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.