CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CYBU.AS (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CYBU.AS is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYBU.AS returned 5.67%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for IB01.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYBU.AS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.

Performance

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBU.AS achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.45% return.

CYBU.AS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 6.98%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: —

IB01.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CYBU.AS iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)	2.52%	2.47%	11.50%	7.81%	2.55%	2.30%	1.05%	1.71%
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)	1.45%	4.34%	5.25%	4.92%	1.08%	0.00%	0.88%	0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBU.AS and IB01.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019	0.06

The correlation between CYBU.AS and IB01.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBU.AS

CYBU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 59
CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CYBU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CYBU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CYBU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CYBU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IB01.L

IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CYBU.AS	IB01.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	11.94	-10.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	36.96	-34.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	8.02	-6.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	115.45	-110.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	569.86	-557.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBU.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBU.AS and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CYBU.AS	IB01.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	11.94	-10.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.20	9.24	-7.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.82	3.79	-1.97

Drawdowns

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBU.AS drawdown since its inception was -4.89%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -0.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBU.AS and IB01.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CYBU.AS	IB01.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.89%	-0.91%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.72%	-0.03%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.84%	-0.09%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.84%	-0.29%	-1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-0.08%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.01%	+0.27%

Volatility

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist) (CYBU.AS) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that CYBU.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CYBU.AS	IB01.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.10%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	0.24%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29%	0.33%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.54%	0.37%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	0.72%	+1.87%

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBU.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CYBU.AS vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

CYBU.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CYBU.AS iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Dist)	1.84%	1.88%	2.13%	2.45%	2.60%	2.82%	2.66%	0.21%
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CYBU.AS and IB01.L in my portfolio?

CYBU.AS and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CYBU.AS or IB01.L?

On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CYBU.AS or IB01.L?

IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBU.AS.

What is the main difference between CYBU.AS and IB01.L?

CYBU.AS is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. CYBU.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CYBU.AS and 0.07% for IB01.L.