CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CYBR.TO (Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CYBR.TO is a fund fund, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Over the past 5 years, CYBR.TO returned 9.43%/yr vs 29.48%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBR.TO achieves a 35.74% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return.

CYBR.TO

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 30.12%
• YTD: 35.74%
• 6M: 27.94%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 25.26%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

XEG.TO

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 44.34%
• 6M: 39.73%
• 1Y: 70.40%
• 3Y*: 28.08%
• 5Y*: 29.48%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units	35.74%	2.14%	13.45%	44.51%	-37.17%	5.69%	66.99%	24.97%	5.96%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	44.34%	16.72%	14.08%	3.52%	53.25%	83.71%	-34.41%	8.98%	-28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR.TO and XEG.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018	0.16

The correlation between CYBR.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CYBR.TO	XEG.TO
Technology	88.2%	-
Communication Services	7.0%	-
Industrials	4.0%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBR.TO

CYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

XEG.TO

XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CYBR.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	3.11	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.66	-2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.49	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	6.36	-5.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	19.02	-17.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBR.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CYBR.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	3.11	-2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	1.04	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.28	+0.30

Drawdowns

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR.TO and XEG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CYBR.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-87.74%	+43.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.10%	-11.12%	-16.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.10%	-25.67%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.40%	-28.42%	-15.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-79.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-4.00%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.93%	-29.19%	+16.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.19%	3.71%	+9.48%

Volatility

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) at 9.31%. This indicates that CYBR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CYBR.TO	XEG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	9.31%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.55%	18.99%	+5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	22.76%	+5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.60%	28.62%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.69%	33.41%	-6.72%

Dividends

CYBR.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

CYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than XEG.TO's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units	0.17%	0.23%	0.24%	0.27%	0.39%	0.26%	0.38%	0.64%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	2.65%	3.63%	3.46%	4.26%	3.31%	1.64%	2.96%	2.70%	2.25%	1.41%	1.40%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CYBR.TO and XEG.TO in my portfolio?

CYBR.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.