PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBIX vs. CSIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBIX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than CSIBX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CYBIX has outperformed CSIBX with an annualized return of 4.26%, while CSIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.


CYBIX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.60%
6M
1.21%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
4.26%

CSIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
0.60%7.73%6.70%10.02%-11.50%3.66%5.46%12.82%-2.53%6.09%
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
0.23%7.93%2.45%6.55%-12.85%0.11%7.39%8.44%-0.16%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBIX and CSIBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2001

0.18

Over the past year, CYBIX and CSIBX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBIX vs. CSIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBIX
CYBIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CYBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CSIBX
CSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.42

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

2.11

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.79

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.67

5.45

+6.22

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the CSIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBIX and CSIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.42

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.13

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.49

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.04

+0.02

Drawdowns

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, which is greater than CSIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBIX and CSIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-17.57%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-3.14%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.62%

-5.95%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-17.57%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.55%

-17.57%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.52%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-2.05%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.03%

-0.55%

Volatility

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) is 1.05%, while Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that CYBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.49%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

2.95%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.97%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

5.50%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.62%

4.55%

+0.07%

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CSIBX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Dividend Comparison

CYBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than CSIBX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
4.31%4.35%4.18%3.28%2.34%3.12%3.39%3.43%2.49%2.22%2.58%2.45%
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
5.82%5.44%5.25%4.47%4.12%4.22%4.49%4.98%5.20%4.92%5.51%5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBIX and CSIBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIBX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to CYBIX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYBIX dropped -32.13% vs CSIBX's -17.57%.

CYBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBIX and CSIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer