PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBIX vs. CSIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBIX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than CSIBX's -0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CYBIX has outperformed CSIBX with an annualized return of 3.97%, while CSIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


CYBIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.82%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
3.97%
ALL TIME*
5.04%

CSIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-1.22%
YTD
-0.87%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
0.40%7.73%6.70%10.02%-11.50%3.66%5.46%12.82%-2.53%6.09%
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
-0.87%7.93%2.45%6.55%-12.85%0.11%7.39%8.44%-0.16%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBIX and CSIBX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2001

0.18

Over the past year, CYBIX and CSIBX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBIX vs. CSIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CYBIX
CYBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CYBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CSIBX
CSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYBIXCSIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.95

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

2.37

+5.39

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the CSIBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBIX and CSIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBIX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, which is greater than CSIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBIX and CSIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-17.57%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-3.14%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.29%

-5.15%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-17.57%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.55%

-17.57%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.60%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-2.05%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

1.26%

-0.74%

Volatility

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert High Yield Bond Fund (CYBIX) is 0.69%, while Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that CYBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBIXCSIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.98%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

3.13%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

3.88%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

5.52%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.56%

+0.04%

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYBIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CSIBX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CYBIX vs. CSIBX - Dividend Comparison

CYBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than CSIBX's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
3.97%4.35%4.18%3.28%2.34%3.12%3.39%3.43%2.49%2.22%2.58%2.45%
CYBIX
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund
5.39%5.44%5.25%4.47%4.12%4.22%4.49%4.98%5.20%4.92%5.51%5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBIX and CSIBX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIBX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to CYBIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYBIX dropped -32.13% vs CSIBX's -17.57%.

CYBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBIX and CSIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer