PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIBX vs. CDHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) and Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIBX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than CDHIX's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIBX has underperformed CDHIX with an annualized return of 2.18%, while CDHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


CSIBX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.18%

CDHIX

1D
2.02%
1M
5.72%
YTD
21.57%
6M
22.45%
1Y
40.71%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
0.16%7.93%2.45%6.55%-12.85%0.11%7.39%8.44%-0.16%4.19%
CDHIX
Calvert International Responsible Index Fund
21.57%33.29%5.04%20.03%-19.22%12.57%15.33%24.38%-13.67%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CSIBX and CDHIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.10

Over the past year, CSIBX and CDHIX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSIBX vs. CDHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIBX
CSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CDHIX
CDHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CDHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) and Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSIBXCDHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.15

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

12.38

-7.86

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the CDHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIBX and CDHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, smaller than the maximum CDHIX drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIBX and CDHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIBXCDHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-32.32%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-12.61%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-13.41%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

-32.01%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.57%

-32.32%

+14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

0.00%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-6.30%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

3.21%

-2.11%

Volatility

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) is 1.26%, while Calvert International Responsible Index Fund (CDHIX) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that CSIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSIBXCDHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

7.44%

-6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

15.03%

-12.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

17.35%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

16.53%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.56%

16.62%

-12.06%

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSIBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than CDHIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSIBX vs. CDHIX - Dividend Comparison

CSIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than CDHIX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDHIX
Calvert International Responsible Index Fund
2.79%3.39%2.87%2.00%1.92%2.00%1.25%1.72%2.25%1.35%2.01%0.00%
CSIBX
Calvert Bond Fund
4.31%4.35%4.18%3.28%2.34%3.12%3.39%3.43%2.49%2.22%2.58%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSIBX and CDHIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDHIX has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to CSIBX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIBX dropped -17.57% vs CDHIX's -32.32%.

CDHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSIBX and CDHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer