CXRN vs. YGLD
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and YGLD (Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while YGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -25.61% vs 21.90% for YGLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for YGLD.
Performance
CXRN vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -16.09% return, which is significantly lower than YGLD's -6.29% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -22.43%
- YTD
- -16.09%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- -25.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGLD
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -6.29%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -16.09% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -6.29% | 96.82% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and YGLD is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
YGLD
CXRN vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXRN | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.13 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 0.64 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 1.46 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXRN | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.54 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | 1.20 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, which is greater than YGLD's maximum drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and YGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.82% | -34.23% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.83% | -34.23% | +7.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.82% | -32.38% | -15.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.13% | -7.97% | -22.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.07% | 15.00% | -0.93% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) at 8.69%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.47% | 8.69% | +6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.83% | 34.68% | -7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.45% | 40.42% | -3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 39.06% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 39.06% | -2.12% |
CXRN vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than YGLD's 19.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.69% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 19.04% | 12.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and YGLD have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to YGLD (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -47.82% vs YGLD's -34.23%.
On 1-year performance, YGLD leads with 21.90% vs -25.61% for CXRN. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YGLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YGLD has performed better with a 21.90% return vs -25.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.04%, compared with 2.69% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while YGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.50% for YGLD.
YGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and YGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer