CXRN vs. IBDT
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and IBDT (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while IBDT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index. CXRN is actively managed, while IBDT is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -7.33% vs 3.43% for IBDT. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBDT.
Performance
CXRN vs. IBDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.17% return, which is significantly lower than IBDT's 1.18% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -7.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.15%
IBDT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.75K | $98.55K | $292.18K | |
| $16.99M | $16.78M | $15.59M |
CXRN vs. IBDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.17% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 1.18% | 7.02% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and IBDT is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. IBDT — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
IBDT
CXRN vs. IBDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXRN | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.51 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 3.85 | -4.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 17.60 | -18.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. IBDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -53.17%, which is greater than IBDT's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and IBDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.17% | -17.79% | -35.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -1.03% | -30.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.00% | -0.06% | -45.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -4.08% | -27.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.66% | 0.22% | +11.44% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. IBDT - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 15.18% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) at 0.44%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | IBDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 0.44% | +14.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.46% | 1.15% | +28.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.65% | 1.59% | +36.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 5.03% | +33.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.12% | 6.31% | +31.81% |
CXRN vs. IBDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. IBDT - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than IBDT's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.38% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 4.14% | 4.56% | 4.67% | 4.10% | 3.25% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 3.32% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and IBDT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to IBDT (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -53.17% vs IBDT's -17.79%.
On 1-year performance, IBDT leads with 3.43% vs -7.33% for CXRN. On fees, IBDT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDT has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBDT has performed better with a 3.43% return vs -7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
IBDT has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 2.38% for CXRN.
CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while IBDT is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.10% for IBDT.
IBDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and IBDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer