PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXRN vs. GLDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXRN vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly lower than GLDW's 1.00% return.


CXRN

1D
-4.40%
1M
-21.78%
YTD
-13.42%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
-23.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDW

1D
-1.20%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
1.00%
6M
3.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-13.42%-1.34%
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
1.00%7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and GLDW is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXRN vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXRNGLDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.67

CXRN vs. GLDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXRNGLDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.42

-1.03

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and GLDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXRNGLDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-23.59%

-23.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.16%

-22.51%

-23.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.08%

-8.93%

-21.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.97%

Volatility

CXRN vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXRNGLDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.32%

36.90%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

36.90%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.90%

36.90%

0.00%

CXRN vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXRN vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than GLDW's 19.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.61%3.30%0.13%
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
19.48%3.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXRN and GLDW have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 2.61% for CXRN.

CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 0.99% for GLDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXRN and GLDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer