CXRN vs. CPXR
CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and CPXR (USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. CXRN is actively managed, while CPXR is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -23.31% vs 37.97% for CPXR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for CPXR.
Performance
CXRN vs. CPXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly lower than CPXR's 21.61% return.
CXRN
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- -23.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPXR
- 1D
- -5.10%
- 1M
- 21.98%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 34.31%
- 1Y
- 37.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN vs. CPXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.42% | -33.25% |
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 21.61% | 36.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXRN and CPXR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXRN vs. CPXR — Risk / Return Rank
CXRN
CPXR
CXRN vs. CPXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXRN | CPXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 0.80 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 1.47 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXRN | CPXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 0.55 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.66 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
CXRN vs. CPXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CPXR drawdown of -47.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and CPXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXRN | CPXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.71% | -47.87% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.27% | -47.87% | +22.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.16% | -5.10% | -41.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.08% | -19.88% | -10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.97% | 25.94% | -11.97% |
Volatility
CXRN vs. CPXR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is 15.39%, while USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a volatility of 18.75%. This indicates that CXRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXRN | CPXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 18.75% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.75% | 45.26% | -18.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.32% | 68.77% | -32.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 68.61% | -31.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 68.61% | -31.71% |
CXRN vs. CPXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CPXR's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXRN vs. CPXR - Dividend Comparison
CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than CPXR's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.61% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXRN and CPXR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPXR has higher volatility (18.75%) compared to CXRN (15.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -46.71% vs CPXR's -47.87%.
On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 37.97% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CXRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 37.97% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.58% for CPXR.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 1.20% for CPXR.
CPXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXRN and CPXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer