CXGCX vs. GCV
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX) and The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV).
CXGCX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. GCV is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Jul 3, 1989.
Performance
CXGCX vs. GCV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CXGCX vs. GCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXGCX Calamos Global Convertible Fund | -1.10% | 18.49% | 10.98% | 13.48% | -22.06% | -0.31% | 38.60% | 15.18% | -2.76% | 14.25% |
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc | 6.04% | 22.86% | 19.93% | -15.58% | -23.95% | 19.99% | 16.97% | 45.72% | -19.03% | 37.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXGCX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than GCV's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CXGCX has underperformed GCV with an annualized return of 7.82%, while GCV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.
CXGCX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 15.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
GCV
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CXGCX vs. GCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXGCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GCV's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CXGCX vs. GCV — Risk / Return Rank
CXGCX
GCV
CXGCX vs. GCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX) and The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXGCX | GCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 2.03 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.97 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 8.62 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXGCX | GCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.17 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.41 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.17 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between CXGCX and GCV is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CXGCX vs. GCV - Dividend Comparison
CXGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than GCV's 11.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXGCX Calamos Global Convertible Fund | 5.28% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 14.77% | 8.19% | 2.36% | 5.75% | 3.73% | 2.22% | 1.30% |
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc | 11.21% | 11.57% | 12.60% | 13.33% | 10.00% | 8.14% | 7.68% | 8.21% | 10.93% | 8.14% | 8.72% | 10.04% |
Drawdowns
CXGCX vs. GCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXGCX drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum GCV drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXGCX and GCV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXGCX | GCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.74% | -55.67% | +24.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.16% | -13.47% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.88% | -45.90% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.74% | -45.90% | +15.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -3.82% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -12.63% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.08% | -1.22% |
Volatility
CXGCX vs. GCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX) is 3.72%, while The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that CXGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CXGCX | GCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 7.83% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 12.52% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 19.38% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 21.18% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 23.49% | -14.05% |