CWVX vs. INTW

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CWVX (Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CWVX returned -87.90% vs 935.27% for INTW. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWVX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

CWVX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWVX achieves a -31.23% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 391.12% return.

CWVX

• 1D: -6.76%
• 1M: -51.73%
• 6M: -54.96%
• YTD: -31.23%
• 1Y: -87.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -8.81%
• 1M: -39.88%
• 6M: 190.06%
• YTD: 391.12%
• 1Y: 935.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWVX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	-31.23%	-81.40%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	391.12%	95.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CWVX and INTW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

CWVX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWVX

CWVX Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CWVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CWVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CWVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CWVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 96
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWVX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CWVX	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	6.16	-6.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	4.04	-4.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.50	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	19.11	-20.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	41.10	-42.36

CWVX vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWVX and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CWVX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWVX drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWVX and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CWVX	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.62%	-60.58%	-29.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.62%	-49.45%	-40.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.62%	-49.45%	-40.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.22%	-29.66%	-36.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	69.85%	22.95%	+46.90%

Volatility

CWVX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) have volatilities of 51.52% and 51.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CWVX	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	51.52%	51.61%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.06%	123.27%	+8.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	187.83%	153.59%	+34.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.87%	149.38%	+38.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	187.87%	149.38%	+38.49%

CWVX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWVX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CWVX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

CWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	3.05%	2.10%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CWVX and INTW in my portfolio?

CWVX and INTW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CWVX or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (51.61%) compared to CWVX (51.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWVX dropped -89.62% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, CWVX or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 935.27% vs -87.90% for CWVX. On fees, CWVX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CWVX or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 935.27% return vs -87.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CWVX or INTW?

CWVX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CWVX or INTW?

CWVX has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between CWVX and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWVX and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.